Headlines
Loading...
Becoming De Sade:How his early life affected his philosophy

Becoming De Sade:How his early life affected his philosophy

Becoming De Sade:

Becoming De Sade:
Becoming De Sade:



Marquis de​ Sade. How his early life affected his philosophy 
Written by Adel Elsherif 

The Marquis de Sade was born Donatien-Alphonse-François de Sade in Paris in 1740, into an aristocratic family. He had a privileged upbringing, as was expected for his class, but even as a child, he showed a rebellious streak—a refusal to conform to social expectations. 

He joined the army and served with distinction, displaying both courage and leadership.
His life, however, took a decidedly unconventional turn upon his marriage to Renée-Pélagie de Montreuil, a woman of considerable wealth. 


Though they had children, the marriage was marked by scandal and unrest. 
The Marquis’s insatiable appetite for pleasure and his disregard for social norms led him into various legal troubles, often resulting in accusations of sexual misconduct.

His behavior became a subject of public outrage. He was imprisoned many times for his libertine lifestyle and writings, spending a significant portion of his adult life 

behind bars. 
These periods of incarceration, far from breaking his spirit, ignited his imagination and fueled his literary output. 
It was within the confines of prison that he wrote his most controversial works: Justine, Philosophy in the Bedroom, and The 120 Days of Sodom.
 
The Marquis de Sade was no stranger to prison. His periods of incarceration—whether in the Bastille, Vincennes, or the Charenton asylum—were frequent and often prolonged. Ironically, these very limitations became the catalyst for his most enduring works.
In the Bastille, for example, he was granted a surprising degree of freedom within his cell, which he used to write and conceal his manuscripts. During the French Revolution, when the Bastille was stormed, the guards, in their haste, failed to search thoroughly. As a result, a number of his writings—including parts of The 120 Days of Sodom—were lost or destroyed.
Over time, he learned to hide his writings with cunning. 

He used various methods: scribbling on scraps of paper, in the margins of books, and even on the walls of his cell. His elaborate clothing became a tool of concealment, with manuscripts tucked into linings and folded into seams. He even hid them inside hollowed-out books.
 These secret caches were always at risk, vulnerable to discovery by prison officials.
Occasionally, the manuscripts were found, leading to their confiscation and, often, destruction.

 Yet he persisted, undeterred. He believed his ideas—his explorations of pleasure and the human condition—were too important to be silenced.
After his transfer to the asylum at Charenton, he experienced a relative freedom of sorts.
He had assistants who transcribed his manuscripts and helped organize his vast collection of writings. 
Even within the constraints of the asylum, he continued to write, to explore, and to challenge the moral codes of his time.

, The discovery of his manuscripts was always a cause for scandal and often resulted in further censure, leading to more confiscations and renewed confinement. 

But these efforts only fueled his rebellion, transforming him into something of an intellectual martyr.
It was through the lens of imprisonment that he developed a keen understanding of the dynamics of power, control, and the human need for freedom. 
The prison walls did not break him—they forged him into one of history’s most provocative authors.
His writings challenged the moral foundations of society and exposed the excesses of the aristocracy. He explored the relationship between power, pleasure, and the human condition. He became a symbol of sexual deviancy and was often painted as a villain.
The French Revolution brought a brief period of freedom. He even served in revolutionary politics, but his radical views were often at odds with the prevailing climate. 
He was imprisoned again during the Reign of Terror, narrowly escaping the guillotine. 
He spent the final years of his life in an asylum, where he continued to write—exploring the darkest corners of the human psyche.
He died in 1814, leaving behind a legacy of scandal, controversy, and philosophical inquiry. 
His name, forever associated with the extremes of human behavior, has entered the lexicon as sadism.
 Yet his work, though often condemned, has also been interpreted as a radical critique of power and a champion of individual freedom.
The Marquis de Sade remains a figure of fascination and debate—a testament to the enduring power of the mind to question, to provoke, and to shock the world.

 

Welcome to my personal blog, where I write thought-provoking philosophy articles and curate hundreds of timeless public domain books - Adel Elsherif .