The book "The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded Upon Their History" by William Whewell, published in 1847, delves into the fundamental principles of philosophy and the relationship between ideas and experiences in the pursuit of knowledge.
In Book I, Whewell begins by discussing the concept of ideas in general. He introduces the fundamental antithesis of philosophy, which includes the dichotomies of thoughts and things, necessary and experiential truths, deduction and induction, theories and facts, ideas and sensations, reflexion and sensation, subjective and objective, and matter and form. He emphasizes the role of man as the interpreter of nature and argues that the fundamental antithesis is inseparable in the pursuit of knowledge. Whewell also explores the concept of successive generalization, highlighting the importance of building upon previous knowledge to form more comprehensive theories.
In Chapter III, Whewell discusses the importance of technical terms in philosophy and provides examples to illustrate their use. He emphasizes the significance of clear and precise language in philosophical discourse.
Chapter IV focuses on necessary truths, which are truths that are universally accepted and cannot be contradicted. Whewell provides examples of necessary truths in numbers and argues that they are essential in shaping our understanding of the world. He also discusses the role of necessary truths in distinguishing between different elements of knowledge.
In Chapter V, Whewell explores the concept of experience and its limitations in proving necessary truths. He argues that while experience is valuable in gaining knowledge, it must be supplemented by ideas in order to arrive at universal truths.
Overall, "The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences" is a comprehensive exploration of the foundations of philosophy and the importance of ideas and experiences in the pursuit of knowledge. Whewell's insights into the relationship between ideas and experiences provide valuable insights for philosophers and scholars alike.

